The Common Mis-Question: Where
would they all live? What would they do?
illustrations like this make it seem that the world is
nearly full of people.
really more like this.
frequent objection to this site is asked like this: "Oh that's
terrible. But where would they all live? What would they all
do?" Even well-meaning pro-lifer's have asked this. The
real problem is we've made it so easy to kill we've forgotten
how to care.
FIRST: This is not a site about
global population issues. However, having said that,
the current popular teaching on population is so rife with
incorrect presuppositions and ideological fallacies that one
should take it all with the highest amount incredulity. The fact
is that you could put the entire population of the world in one US
State. There is plenty of room on the earth for lots of people.
The issue is governance, not resources. Do your own research.
SECOND: Let's be blunt and clear.
Conception can occur when a couple has sexual intercourse.
That's it. It's that simple. We've so commoditized sex that many
simply see it as a casual act and don't care about the
consequences: A new life. So let's look at this way: Are you so
driven for 20-30 seconds of pleasure during an orgasm that
provides a way to have a potential pregnancy that you willing to
kill the baby that is a result of your selfish drive? You could
just masturbate. Wait, maybe this most intimate of experiences
has a greater purpose than your moment of pleasure. Maybe it's
part of pattern that creates personal intimacy that sustains
relationships for decades and provides long-term stable
environments for children. Maybe there is more to sex than just
THIRD: More importantly is the
ethical issue of life.
If you are so willing to
destroy life, selfishly, to protect your future then what will
stop someone from destroying you to protect their future if they think you are using
more than your reasonable use of resources?
- When you are old, and absorbing resources for care and
- If you are injured and incapable of working?
- When you are deemed not smart enough?
- Or your race is considered substandard?
- If there is a huge natural disaster or war and there
aren't enough resources?
You see, if you buy the 'woman's right' argument then what
about government's right or the right of force? You think just
because you escaped the opening of your mother's vagina you are
entitled to life? You are wrong if you buy this argument. It's
only a matter of physical presence and necessity.
FOURTH: It is selfish to destroy the
future. We hear a lot about mortgaging our
financial future and placing the burden on our children.
Abortion is doing the same. We are damning them to a future
bereft of talent and wide range human resources. We will cast
them into a horrible pit of decisions that will have to be made
when, in the near future of Europe and Asia, and later the US,
we run out of people to maintain the basic standards of society
because they are completely absorbed caring for the elderly.
Can you really justify the wanton destruction of completely innocent
human beings because you are worried about their future? If
that's the case, then why would anyone have children?
What are we really doing?
Destroying human lives.
And that’s just the beginning…
Review the chart. Then review
Abortions Chart, and the
Including pre-Roe v Wade Chart Then read the
Cost and the
"My Little Room" Video. Be sure to read the
Background page as